Is AI just as or even more fallible than humans?

The conversation below proves that it is. Big time. It is either programmed to mimic humans with all their faults or to save on resources.

In either way, it disappoints those that thought it would be ideal for objective, well-defined jobs that can be done with 100% accuracy once the processing power and the speed are there but no human factors can compromise the results.

What’s most interesting is that AI is good at making up things that are so wild that they would never cross the mind of most inside-the-box thinking humans.

Instead of the unerring logics machine we expected we now have a random bs generator but the halllucinating skills of AI can be used in research areas where ideas nobody has ever thought of are welcomed.

So AI turns out to be best with the exact opposite we thought it would be. Instead of fast and dry computing, it’s boundless creativity is winning.

You just shouldn’t buy everything it says and not be misled by its convincing and organized style, seemingly clear argumentation and excellent language skills. Use it for brainstorming. At this stage.

Screenshot of a conversation discussing miscommunication and mistakes made regarding engine designs and components.
Screenshot of a conversation discussing the importance of precision in technical topics and the consequences of misleading information related to engine maintenance.
A screenshot of a text conversation discussing the speaker's acknowledgment of mistakes made in communication, emphasizing the importance of using verified, engine-specific information instead of making assumptions.
A screenshot of a text conversation discussing the differences between human and AI reasoning, emphasizing the importance of checking details and avoiding assumptions.

Leave a comment